Thursday, September 30, 2010

The Mullahs’ Murder of Americans

The Mullahs’ Murder of Americans

 




Michael Ledeen sheds light on how Iran kills our troops – and why nothing is said or done about it....


Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Michael A. Ledeen, a noted political analyst and a Freedom Scholar at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. He is the author of The Iranian Time Bomb, Machiavelli on Modern Leadership and Tocqueville on American Character, and he is a contributor to The Wall Street Journal. His latest book is Accomplice to Evil: Iran and the War Against the West.



FP: Michael A. Ledeen, welcome back to Frontpage Interview.

I would like to talk to you today about how Iran is killing our troops and why nobody is really doing anything about it.

Share with us what is going on.


Ledeen: They have been killing Americans for 30 years. That’s what the chants of “Death to America!” are all about. From the Hezbollah suicide attacks on the US Embassy and Marine barracks in Beirut in the early 1980s, to the use of Iranian-made roadside bombs and mines in Iraq and Afghanistan by terrorists trained in Iran, to armed assaults against American troops by members of the Quds force, Iran is at war with us.
 
Every so often a military leader calls attention to this fact, but no publication, and no political leader, makes it a central theme of our national debate. Why? Because if you accept the fact that the Iranian regime is killing Americans almost every day, you are compelled to do something about it. And hardly anyone is willing to do anything effective. The only evil action by the mullahs that interests the West is the nuclear program, even though they have demonstrated very clearly that they don’t need nukes to murder and maim thousands of Americans.

FP: Why did Iran declare war on us? Why is it waging war on us? Is there anything we can do to get them to stop?

Ledeen: Declaring war on us is at the heart of the Iranian Revolution; war on the modern world was Khomeini’s dream. That’s why he called us The Great Satan. I don’t think we can talk them out of their core values. As Jonathan Swift said, you can’t reason a man out of something he didn’t reason himself into in the first place.


FP: Can you expand for us a bit on the process by which Iran kills our troops today? You mention Iranian-made roadside bombs and mines in Iraq and Afghanistan and armed assaults against American troops by members of the Quds force. Tell us some more what’s happening here.


Ledeen: Thousands of Americans have been killed and wounded.  Those who plant the mines and bombs–the IEDs and the EFPs–are often trained by Iranians in Iran.  And many of the suicide bombers are also trained by Iranians.

FP: Let us suppose someone like Newt Gingrich becomes President in 2012 and gets the courage to make this a central theme of our national debate. He calls you and says, “Michael, what can and should my administration do about this?” What do you tell him?


Ledeen: Support the Iranian opposition. Talk to them, ask them what they need, and then get it to them.


FP: What are the prospects, do you think, of Iranians overthrowing the tyranny that oppresses them? In other words, can a revolution against the Mullahs succeed in the near future?


Ledeen: Yes it can succeed. The overwhelming majority of Iranians want it to succeed, and it would have succeeded long since, IMHO, if the opposition had had some outside help. But no Western country has helped.


FP: Your thoughts on Obama?


Ledeen: I think of him like a typical Ivy League undergraduate, gulled by political correctness, who doesn’t understand American greatness, and instead blames us for most of the world’s problems and injustices.  He wants to cut America down to size.


FP: Looking back at your career and experiences, what are some of the key lessons you have learned that you think are crucial for an American administration to absorb and act upon?


Ledeen: There’s a lot to learn, and I’ve only learned a small part of it.  But the main thing is what Machiavelli says to leaders:  you will be judged on whether you win or lose, and everybody hates a loser.  Unfortunately we have a generation of Western leaders who prefer to be nice losers.  The other big thing is that the world looks to America for guidance; there is no escape from our role as a superpower…like it or not.

FP: Your perspective on Russia’s role vis-à-vis Iran?


Ledeen: Hah! My favorite mystery. There is no doubt that the Russians played a significant role in the creation of the Islamic Republic’s terror apparatus and intelligence services. That said, we (or at least I) don’t know nearly enough. I can’t believe that the Russians want the mullahs to have nuclear weapons; they know that the ayatollahs are constantly stirring up jihad in the Balkans. So, for example, when I hear about this computer “worm” I wonder if it’s the Russians…I think the Russians work very hard to get control over at least part of the Islamic Republic, but the Iranians do not trust them, and so there’s a kind of “balance of paranoia.” It’s a great subject. Ask Pacepa about it.


FP: Your thoughts on the Left’s behavior in our terror war in general?


Ledeen: What can I say?  Too many of them want us to lose.


FP: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about our civilization’s will and capacity to defend itself from radical Islam?

Ledeen: I’m an optimist by nature, as my father was. I cannot imagine losing to a group that is locked in the 12th century. We are more adaptive, and stronger by orders of magnitude. They will lose every major battle, and eventually they will lose standing with the umma. When Iran finally comes down, the whole world will change for the better, and we will have a much easier time of it. It’s maddening to see that our leaders don’t seem to see the war whole, and don’t agree that regime change in Tehran is the best single stroke in the war against the terror masters. As it has been from day one. Somebody said that.

FP: Michael A. Ledeen, thank you for joining Frontpage Interview.


Jamie Glazov is Frontpage Magazine's editor. He holds a Ph.D. in History with a specialty in Russian, U.S. and Canadian foreign policy. He is the author of Canadian Policy Toward Khrushchev’s Soviet Union and is the co-editor (with David Horowitz) of The Hate America Left. He edited and wrote the introduction to David Horowitz’s Left Illusions. His new book is United in Hate: The Left's Romance with Tyranny and Terror. Email him at jamieglazov11@gmail.com






Ecuadorean troops stormed a hospital in Quito late on Thursday and rescued President Rafael Correa

Troops storm Ecuador hospital, free Correa

By Hugh Bronstein and Alexandra Valencia



Ecuadorean army soldiers stand on the runway of the military airbase
of the Mariscal Sucre International Airport
to force its closure, in Quito September 30, 2010.

(Reuters) - Ecuadorean troops stormed a hospital in Quito late on Thursday and rescued President Rafael Correa, who had been holed up surrounded by renegade police protesting against government austerity measures.

Correa arrived back at the presidential palace in the capital, where local TV images showed a large crowd of supporters cheering and waving Ecuador's flag.


Amid heavy gunfire, he had been freed after soldiers raided the building where he had spent most of the day.


Dissident police had earlier attacked Correa, prompting the 47-year-old leftist leader to seek refuge in the hospital, where he accused rivals of trying to topple him in a coup.


The U.S.-trained economist and friend of Venezuela's socialist firebrand Hugo Chavez took power in 2007, alienating foreign investors but winning approval ratings with populist policies like greater state control over natural resources.


The United Nations and governments across the Americas threw their support behind Correa, with the White House backing him and calling for a peaceful resolution to the crisis.


Global oil prices rose to a seven-week high of near $80 a barrel, partly due to the turmoil in OPEC's smallest member.



Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Wal-Mart Bids $4.6 Billion for South Africa's Massmart


Wal-Mart Bids $4.6 Billion for South Africa's Massmart


By MIGUEL BUSTILLO in Houston,
ROBB. M. STEWART in Johannesburg
and PAUL SONNE in London


Wal-Mart Stores Inc. made an aggressive but expensive bid to expand in Africa ahead of its international competitors, offering to buy South African retailer Massmart Holdings Inc. for 32 billion rand ($4.6 billion).

Wal-Mart's proposed offer—the company's biggest acquisition in more than a decade—would represent a relatively high premium for Massmart, a 290-store chain operating in 13 African nations.

Yet a deal would give the Bentonville, Ark., giant a critical foothold to expand in Africa and allow Wal-Mart to beat European multinational rivals Carrefour SA, Tesco PLC and Metro AG into the potentially lucrative sub-Saharan market.

Massmart would serve as "a fantastic entry point to a broader part of the continent," said Andy Bond, a former chief executive of Wal-Mart's U.K. subsidiary Asda, who is spearheading the purchase. Massmart already is expanding beyond its South Africa base, Mr. Bond said in an interview Monday.

A shopper left a Massmart chain, the Game store,
in South Gate mall south of Johannesburg, South Africa, on Monday.
Wal-Mart has learned the hard way that a first-mover advantage can be important in international retailing.

Carrefour, Wal-Mart's global archrival, beat Wal-Mart to South America, opening stores in Brazil in 1975, nearly two decades before Wal-Mart. The France-based company also was the first major international chain to establish a presence in Asia, through a joint venture in Taiwan in 1989.

Despite investing billions of dollars building and buying stores, Wal-Mart still trails Carrefour in Brazil today. And Carrefour remains the largest international retailer in China, the most coveted retail market in the developing world. While Carrefour doesn't have sub-Saharan operations, the chain has stores in northern Africa.

Wal-Mart's African foray is risky, however. The offer is roughly 13 times Massmart's pretax earnings and would place Wal-Mart into a politically combustible region.

South Africa is emerging slowly from the recession, is plagued by high crime and unemployment and marked with a heavily unionized work force known for long, sometimes violent, strikes. Other sub-Saharan nations carry even more political risks.

"Massmart is well positioned as a springboard for sub-Saharan Africa, but we believe that it will take a much longer time period for the company to earn its cost of capital in Africa," said Janney Montgomery Scott analyst David Strasser. "For every relatively stable country like Botswana, there is a Zimbabwe."

Nevertheless, Wal-Mart appears prepared to face those risks as it looks to extend its reach in emerging markets and expand its international business, which makes up a fourth of the company's roughly $405 billion in annual revenue.

The international division clearly is Wal-Mart's growth engine, now that sales at U.S. stores open at least a year have fallen for five consecutive quarters. The company is examining entering other emerging markets as well, including Russia and the Middle East. "Wal-Mart is a company that wants to aggressively expand world-wide," Mr. Bond said.



But Wal-Mart hasn't always managed to get its formula right abroad, in part because the retailer sometimes has failed to cater to local habits and markets. Wal-Mart in 2006 abandoned its Germany operation after spending eight years trying to crack the market, one of Europe's most competitive discount-retailing environments. Wal-Mart pulled out of South Korea last decade.

South Africa, particularly Johannesburg and Cape Town, is an attractive prospect, drawing shoppers from Nigeria, Kenya and elsewhere on the continent because of its well developed roads and wide range of retailers, from discount stores to high-end, international brands.

Like Wal-Mart, Massmart operates low-cost, high-volume stores with a strong general retail business and an emerging food operation. Founded in 1990, Massmart operates several chains, including Game general-merchandise stores, Makro warehouse-club stores and Builders Warehouse for construction and home improvement.

Massmart is one of several large chains, including Shoprite Holdings Ltd. and Woolworths Holdings Ltd., that dominate South Africa and have expanded into neighboring countries. Massmart reported sales of 47.55 billion rand in the fiscal year through June, up 10% from a year earlier.

Wal-Mart made a nonbinding proposal that could lead to a cash offer of 148 rand ($21.08) a share for Massmart. The companies said Monday that they are in exclusive negotiations to try to hammer out a deal, which would be subject to regulatory approval.

Massmart's shares closed 11% higher at 149 rand in Johannesburg, giving the company a market value of about 30 billion rand and indicating that Wal-Mart may have to adjust its offer somewhat higher. Wal-Mart shares fell 60 cents to $53.48 in 4 p.m. composite trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

"It is early days," Massmart CEO Grant Pattison said during a conference call. He said his impression is that Massmart's entire management team would be retained in a deal.

Mr. Bond said Wal-Mart, should it close the deal, would support Massmart's existing black economic-empowerment arrangements, and try to enhance them where possible. Companies in South Africa are required to include equity ownership by blacks as part of the government's efforts to reverse years of apartheid rule and bring the majority population into the mainstream economy.


**Write to Miguel Bustillo at miguel.bustillo@wsj.com
and Paul Sonne at paul.sonne@wsj.com **





Jazmine Sullivan - 10 Seconds

Jazmine Sullivan - 10 Seconds

http://www.jazminesullivanmusic.com/us/home












Karzai's tears: Afghan president breaks down on national TV over fears 'next generation' will flee war-torn country

Karzai's tears: Afghan president breaks down on national TV over fears 'next generation' will flee war-torn country



President Hamid Karzai today broke down in tears as he called on Afghans to 'come to their senses' or risk seeing the next generation flee the country.

Speaking on national television, he identified members of a peace council that will attempt to seek a political rather than a military solution to the Taliban insurgency.

And he spoke of his fears that the problems in the country could drive his son Mirwais away from his homeland.


Plea: President Hamid Karzai weeps on television as he speaks about his fears
that insurgency in Afghanistan could force his son to leave
 He said: 'I do not want Mirwais, my son, to be a foreigner, I do not want this.

'I want Mirwais to be Afghan. Therefore come to your senses... you are witnessing what is happening on our soil and only through our efforts can our homeland be ours.'

Mr Karzai spent many years in exile in Pakistan while fighting against the Soviet occupation in the 1980s and later during Taliban rule.

He was speaking in front of an audience at an international literacy day in a Kabul school.

This year has been the bloodiest since the conflict began in 2001 when U.S. forces overthrew the Taliban weeks after the September 11 attacks.

But with the insurgency gaining strength despite the presence of nearly 150,000 foreign troops, there is a growing sense that talks may be the only route to peace.
Plan: Mr Karzai announced some of the members of a
peace council, or jirga, aimed at coaxing Taliban insurgents away from the battlefield


Involved: Afghan women listen to the speech at a school in
Kabul where Mr Karzai said insurgency threatened the next generation


In June, Mr Karzai summoned a peace jirga, or traditional gathering of tribal and community leaders.

But the Taliban have rejected the idea of talks, saying all foreign forces must leave Afghanistan.

The new council will have more than 68 members including two former presidents, at least two former Taliban officials, as well as clerics and women.

It will try to help mediate peace talks with Taliban-led insurgents.

Its members were agreed after deliberations with tribal chiefs and power brokers, some of whom sided with the U.S. in toppling the Taliban in 2001.

He said: 'The government of Afghanistan with further seriousness... should take vigorous steps for bringing peace to this soil as soon as possible.'
Future: The peace council will include Taliban figures and women
Mr Karzai's plan involves luring Taliban foot soldiers away from the battlefield with cash and job incentives while seeking reconciliation with senior militant leaders by offering them asylum in Muslim countries and striking their names off a UN blacklist.

Donor nations, most of them in Western countries, have pledged to provided tens of millions of dollars for bringing over the foot Taliban soldiers.

Mr Karzai has set an ambitious target of 2014 for Afghanistan to take over security responsibility from U.S. and NATO forces.

U.S. President Barack Obama, who will conduct a war strategy review in December, also plans to begin a gradual withdrawal of U.S. troops from July 2011 if conditions allow.

Washington's NATO allies are increasingly uneasy about the unpopular war and are eager to shift security responsibilities to Afghan forces.




Saturday, September 25, 2010

Gangland: BMF

Gangland: BMF



My Apology (to the men) by Brittny Johnson **Poetry**

My Apology (to the men)




I'm tired of playing the tough girl,
the one I was raised to be.
Cause the truth of the matter is
that just isn't me.
I've fought and fought but
it wasn't in vain,
Cause it taught me strength
and how to numb my pain.

But it's hard being so strong
when the devil is all around
And almost every man in my life
has let me down.
My father, some lovers, and
even some friends,
Have took all I had
and left me to mend.

I have picked up the pieces of my heart
and restored them like new
And of course, my mom says
"I am proud of you."
But really what is there
to proud of?
That I hide my feelings, mask my emotions
fear love.

While everyone else has
to feel the wrath of my storm
Cause I think every man
is out to do harm.
I trust no one
and I am all alone.
There's no place
that I can call "home"

Lord, Im down and out
and I need healing.
From all these evil feelings
that Im feeling.
And I know that You're
the only one who
Hears my calls please be there
to catch me when I fall.

As I am writing these words
tears are continuously rolling down my face.
Cause of all my emotions
are coming to place.
I am sad and hopeful
all at the same time.
Cause Im about to win this war
and victory shall be mine.

Im taking off my mask
and revealing the real me.
And im really nervous
for you to see:
That Im just a woman,
and it's true what they say:
Im emotional, nurturing, and loving
all on a good day.

Then I am angry,
weak, and jealous at the end of the week,
But that's who I am
and Im asking that you accept me.
So here is my apology
for taking it out on you.
I just want to be happy and respected,
just as you do.

But I refuse to be deceited,
and talked down upon.
I am a woman with class
and expect to be treated like one.
Im going to stay on your case
like I do all the rest.
Cause I know your potential
and I want you to be your best.

Please forgive me for wanting
to be perfect for you.
But I realize I cannot
and that's a harsh truth.
So take me as I am now,
with a pure and open heart.
I want you in my life,
whether side by side or apart.

**Write to Brittny N. Johnson at brjohns07@yahoo.com**

Brittny Johnson

Worrying Parallels Between the Weimar Republic and Modern Western Society

Worrying Parallels Between the Weimar Republic and Modern Western Society


Feminine 'Freedoms' – Moral Corruption – Immoral Entertainment – Homosexual and Lesbian Openess – Weakened Police Authority

Any Of This Sound Familiar?


(Reading advice: To get the explosive message of this article please read until the end)

I t is Germany, 1928. Raucous laughter from the cabaret seeps outside as Lotte passes in the shadows of the cold Berlin night. The streets are sexually charged, lined with a heady concoction of prostitution, homosexuality, transvestism and drugs. Still spinning from the collective lust roaring unashamedly through the theatre that evening, Lotte heads now for the café bar at the Eden Hotel where she lives. Jostling with leggy glamour girls as she takes her drink, Lotte pushes a straying strand of short hair behind her ear, settles her slender trouser-suited body into the deep folds of an armchair and smiles provocatively as she lights a cigarette.

Berlin's interwar reputation of hedonistic decadence and debauchery is familiar through scenes from Metropolis by Fritz Lang, images of Marlene Dietrich in The Blue Angel by Josef von Sternberg and stage productions of The Threepenny Opera by Bertolt Brecht. A ferment of artistic and sexual experimentation, the Weimar Republic (1918-1933) privileged an outpouring of cultural creativity in the Bauhaus movement of modern art and the development of the International Style in modern architecture. Against a background of inflation and depression, Berlin drew the talent and energies of the rest of Germany towards its glittering cabaret performances and burgeoning sex tourism industry. From within this hotbed of frenzied immorality, supposedly constitutional sexual equality worked to create the myth of the sexually liberated and financially independent 'New Woman' in Weimar German society.'

So Kasey West begins her brief essay , Life is (more than just) a Cabaret: the 'New Woman' in Weimar Germany Her introduction is a very vivid description of night-life in Germany's Weimar Republic.


Field Marshall Von Hindenburg became German chancellor in 1925.
Much later he encountered circumstances which required him to work with Hitler,
 but he never seems to have trusted the Austrian World War I corporal.


The German Weimar Republic (1919-1933) is an especially interesting period in German history since it bridged the gap between Germany's loss of the Great War (1914-1918) and Adolf Hitler's coming to power in 1933.

The Treaty of Versailles (1919) had imposed painful financial penalties on Germany following their defeat in the Great War (especially painful, perhaps, because right up to the end, the German public had been told that they were winning the war!), and the next few years were years of unrest and political turmoil yet – paradoxically – also unparalled artistic freedom.

In 1923 Germany actually defaulted on its war repayments and the Ruhr was occupied but this very difficult period quickly led to the best period of the Weimar Republic due to some wise, canny and fleet-footed leadership by Gustav Stresseman who became Chancellor in 1923 and then a very adept foreign minister until 1929. Stresseman could see that runaway inflation was best solved by a very strict monetary policy including the refusal to print more money and the establishment of a new currency, the Rentenmark. Largely due to Stresseman's influence, 1923-1929 was a period of relative stability for Germany when there were fewer uprisings and seemingly the beginnings of an economic recovery. Suddenly there was again hope and people looked to enjoy themselves: cafes, clubs and cabaret bars opened everywhere in a new spirit of liberty.

So this first attempt to establish a liberal democracy in Germany began during a time of civil conflict, and ultimately collapsed with the ascent of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in 1933.

It is interesting to consider some fascinating parallels between this fledgling liberal democracy and western democratic society at the beginning of this 21st century:


Women Become Assertive Leaders


Probably one of the least expected results of the new Weimar government was a sudden relaxing in previously widely-accepted gender roles and sexual moral conduct. German society had always represented women as 'mothers of the nation' but now German women suddenly found themselves in a strong political position and they dominated the Weimar electorate. This is because, out of a total population of 60 million Germans, two million young men between the ages of 18 and 34 had been killed in World War I and another two million had been so severely physically or mentally injured that they could play little role in government at any level. Many other older men of experience in government were now becoming too old and their influence had waned. This set of unusual circumstances presented the women of Germany with an unusual and unique opportunity to become major players right across German life!


Marlene Dietrich during the Weimar years.
To her left stands Richard Tauber (1891-1948) the famed Austrian tenor

Although women had not been allowed to participate in any political organizations prior to 1914, they now readily grasped the new opportunities that the war and its aftermath brought to them. In the earliest years of the Weimar Republic women voted in large numbers and keenly supported the pro-Republican parties that had granted them the vote; later on women also became avid supporters of the Nazi Party. This high profile of many assertive women was an entirely new thing in German society. Women became leaders in the arts, show business and even in business and commerce. It is no surprise that the very long career of sexual icon Marlene Dietrich was launched during the Weimar years, her film The Blue Angel appeared in Germany in 1930. Numerous other women also forged out sparkling careers during these years, including the dramatic actress, Elizabeth Berger and the famed cabaret director, Trude Hesterberg. The fame, power, success and independence of women during these years has led to some calling the Weimar days, 'the first experiment in women's liberation.'


Sexually-Explicit “Entertainment”


The cabaret and night club scene of the Weimar Republic has become legendary! The entertainment was often dominated by scantily-clad women and on-stage nudity. Lines of frequently topless stage 'chorus girls,' in various revues and cabarets became more and more common as the Weimar years progressed. The popular songs also became heavily charged with sexual innuendo.

This cartoon of the time seems to sum up the new atmosphere in Weimar
in which a people deprived of former leaders turned to the model of the 'assertive female.'
But this is not all: Homosexual and lesbian bars also started appearing in major German cities, especially in Berlin. Of course, this shocked many Germans but a certain momentum had been unleashed which would now be difficult to control. It is probably fair to say that while earlier German societies had glorified Motherhood, and the Mother's duty to the Fatherland (which later returned under Hitler), the Weimar years glorified Women, Sexuality and Free Expression. Hedonism (the belief that the good of men and women is best served by the pursuit of pleasure), was actually seized upon by the liberal Weimar government as a way to unite the ever-present political squabbles of German life. There was a feeling that the Germans had suffered long enough and - in a land with an unreliable economy – all should enjoy themselves while they could! Then, in 1927 prostitution was de-criminalized.

...Fears about the loss of a stable sexual and moral order played a key role in Weimar democracy’s fall. The decriminalization of prostitution in 1927 entailed vital gains in prostitutes’ rights and marked a radical break with their precarious legal status under the old system of police-controlled prostitution. Despite certain limitations,the 1927 reforms represented a major political victory for liberal feminists, socialists, and sexual reformers. This explains why prostitution became such a central target of right-wing (and ultimately Nazi) attacks...” (Weimar's Crisis Through the Lens of Gender: The Case of Prostitution. Julie Roos, Fritz Stern Dissertation Prize Presentation, Princeton University, November 15, 2002).

Roos continues,
The Law for Combating Venereal Diseases (anti-VD law), which introduced the prostitution reforms, also lifted the ban on the advertisement and display of certain contraceptives that could function as prophylactics. After 1927, many cities installed vending machines for the sale of condoms in public lavatories. For women, the improved access to certain contraceptives marked an important gain in reproductive rights...”


Is any of this starting to sound familiar?


Weakened Police Authority Leading to Lawlessness



The Weimar Republic, with it's liberal agenda, soon led to weakened policing and to a haven for criminals.


Famed actress and cabaret director Trude Hesterburg
epitomized much of the frequently
female-led and often wild 'entertainment' of Weimar Germany.

In the Holocaust Encyclopedia's article German Police: From Weimar Republic to Nazi Dicatatorship we read this,

The police faced funding cuts in hiring, training, promotions, and raises. Nor was there money for modernization, such as buying new forensic equipment or firearms...”

Of course, part of the problem here was the plain lack of cash due to the burden of war reparations. But another problem was that courts were not properly punishing offenders, because it was sometimes simpler and more inexpensive simply not to press charges. All of these factors affected police morale. The Holocaust Encyclopedia article continues,

Even as police manpower suffered from budgetary cuts, the economic distress endemic to the Weimar Republic contributed to a rapid increase in crime. Criminal gangs involved in prostitution, narcotics, gambling, pornography, robbery, and burglary developed and flourished. These gangs were well organized and often operated across state lines, frustrating police investigations......Policemen were frustrated by restrictions on police authority. Some criminal cases were dismissed because the police failed to safeguard the rights of the accused or because important evidence was excluded because of improper police procedures. The emergence of a free press highly critical of police operations exacerbated these police failures.”

The police were often simply powerless to pursue criminals and crime became rampant; the public perception, undoubtedly, was that criminals could simply bribe their way out of trouble if they needed to since they often seemed to have more money than law-abiding people.

In short, the population lost confidence in both the police and the courts to properly apprehend and punish law-breakers. Sound familiar? It will sound familiar to modern Britons for sure!


The Backlash To All Of This.....


Of course, there is always a backlash and from 1932 Catholic and Lutheran groups succeeded in again banning official state-sanctioned prostitution. The backlash gathered momentum when the Nazi Party came to power in 1933. It is true that, to quote the old saying, 'Hitler again got the trains running on time' – but it is often forgotten today that one of the major reasons that Hitler became so popular is because he was seen as a 'strong leader' who would rid Germany of the moral corruption of the Weimar Republic! For, as the 1920s progressed, there was a growing moral revulsion among ordinary Germans about the immorality, widespread corruption and weakened police authority which a liberal government had presided over.

Hitler with Field Marshall Von Hindenburg.
Hindenburg was so popular with the people that the
Nazi state could not be established until his death.
Of course, as we now know, Hitler was no solution and he was to lead Germany into a truly devastating war within seven years of his coming to power.

We would be blind indeed if we did not note the obvious parallels between the Weimar Republic and modern Europe, Britain and the United States. Of course, the big difference is that today we are economically strong and the Weimar years were economically perilous (although recovery certainly promised between 1923 and 1929). But economic health for a nation is never guaranteed!

Just when the Weimar years were beginning to promise real prosperity the 1929 Wall Street Crash came along. This led to the Great Depression of the 1930s and to a worldwide recession. Germany was particularly affected because she depended heavily on American loans. In 1932, somewhere between 4 and 7 million Germans were unemployed. Many people blamed the Weimar Republic for this – Don't people always blame their governments when economic catastrophe strikes? Eventually neither left-wing nor right-wing factions had any will to save the Weimar government and a certain Herr Hitler stepped in – the rest (as they say) is history!

A growing majority in Germany had come to despise the Weimar experiment with its apparent encouragement of widespread moral corruption right across German life but when this was accompanied by complete economic collapse (on this occasion, hardly the fault of the German government) that was just too much! Quite suddenly the German people were prepared to give their full backing and support to a rather strange but charismatic individual who promised a glorious future – indeed, a 'thousand year reich.'

They were prepared to embark on a new course (or, so they thought!) of peace, prosperity and with a new and glorious Deutschland standing right at the centre of world affairs!


The Lesson For Us

There is no doubt that - over a period of time – liberal societies build up bigger and bigger opposition from an ever-present right-wing. As long as there is prosperity, however, with good food on the table and a good and abundant living for all the family, the anger against the moral weakness always inherent within liberalism can be deferred but when economic disaster strikes, weak leadership is always blamed and liberal societies always appear to be weak in leadership.

President Bush is not a weak leader – he is rightly considered a conservative, and yet liberal standards have permeated almost all of American life. Here in Britain and in Europe it is probably even worse: liberalism rules and political correctness paralyzes! Censorship is now so weak that it has almost gone. Even while European leaders constantly argue about 'rebates' and about increased union, our cities are filled with crime and violence and corruption is rife even in the formerly largely law-abiding British Isles, but somehow (being liberals) European leaders are not too concerned about that! Pornography now even has it's own television channels (several of them) – again, being liberals, our leaders think that is perfectly fine, yet I find that a growing majority of the public are angry at the way things are going and are so disenchanted with politicians that they now refuse to vote at all.

What is my point?

My point is that – at some point - there will be a right-wing backlash and if a charismatic leader with extreme solutions should suddenly appear on the scene he will quickly gain the support of countless thousands - many of whom may not have voted for years because of disillusionment with liberal politics.

Some would say that that could not happen now because our liberal governments have actually legislated against right wing politics – I mean, it is now actually illegal to make many comments which would have once been considered “right-wing.” But I have got news for these people: they are completely wrong! In view of Germany's volatile history, the Weimar Republic also thought they had come up with a system and a constituition which barred radical right-wingers from power! But that did not stop Adolf Hitler!!

The lesson of human history is that when economic calamity strikes, civil unrest immediately follows and.....
all conventional, polite Sunday-afternoon tea party politics immediately goes out of the window!!

I have not even drawn direct comparisons between the Weimar years and modern liberal western society in this article because I think that those parallels are so overwhelmingly obvious. If you still want to make direct connections just check out the sub-titles to this article's title right at the top of your screen. To save you doing that, here they are:

Feminine “Freedoms” – Moral Corruption – Immoral Entertainment – Homosexual and Lesbian Openess – Weakened Police Authority Leading to Criminals Going Unpunished...

I will let you draw your own conclusions. I do not think that you will find it too difficult.

I will close this article with a rhetorical question addressed to the reader:

If economic (or any other) calamity should strike the west, will a strong and charismatic right-wing leader again burst on to the scene in the United States, Great Britain or the European Union who will offer dynamic but dangerous solutions?

If that should happen, then make no mistake that Liberalism will have been the cause.

Think that could never happen again? Oh please, my complacent reader, learn the lesson of
history: The lesson of human history is that evil can always happen again....

Write to Robin A. Brace at http://xinbox.com/museltof

Friday, September 24, 2010

Psycho in Town

Psycho in Town



Ahmadinejad enlightens the UN about his longing for the return of the 12th Imam — and his solidarity with 9/11 Truthers.



The United Nations played host to the latest version of the president of Iran’s road show yesterday. This was a subtly different Ahmadinejad than we’ve seen addressing world leaders in New York heretofore. His trademark mixture of insufferable smugness and blustering defiance was on display to be sure, but this speech was more about the former than the latter and that’s something of a change. It appears that there’s no need to spew much vitriol at the president of the United States any longer, for the leader of the Great Satan has rendered himself all but impotent without much Muslim assistance. Why would Ahmadinejad waste his breath denouncing or threatening the paper tiger currently occupying the White House?
 
Instead, Ahmadinejad used the global stage that the UN provided in order to show the world that nobody understands the problems confronting humanity better than he does. Religious scholar, champion of the poor, master of geo-politics, economic guru – these are but some of the many facets that define the President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and if you have any doubt about that, just ask him.

Ahmadinejad, if not quite declaring Islam victorious, seems more confident of the final outcome than ever. He said that the era of capitalism is coming to an end, after “one hundred years of domination.” Selling Adam Smith short by a couple of centuries, Ahmadinejad would – in typical fashion – later contradict his confused understanding of world history by asserting that the Western powers were responsible for ravaging the rest of the world through colonialism and slavery. The fact that colonialism and slavery were features of Western societies before the “one hundred years of domination” seemed to be entirely lost on him.

The solution to the world’s problems, he declared, was to turn to God, a sentiment that tens of millions of Americans would agree with in the broadest of terms. But of course when Ahmadinejad speaks of God, he’s really referring to the only acceptable version of the Deity that Islam tolerates. He parroted the Qur’an’s assertion that the people who refuse to accept the God of Muhammad deny the most obvious of truths because of selfishness and greed. Every prophet was confronted by similar unbelievers, were they not? Moses had Pharaoh and Jesus had the Pharisees. What’s the analogous group when it comes to Muhammad? Well, that would be us: we stubborn, egotistical Westerners who can’t bring ourselves to understand that God appointed a succession of prophets and that it is our duty to keep up with the program.

He asked the UN to proclaim 2011 the year of nuclear disarmament, and even helpfully provided a slogan: “Nuclear energy for all, nuclear weapons for none.” The first half of that couplet has a certain attraction, especially in the third world countries desperate for cheap power. But, it makes no sense in a nation like Iran, where the billions that Ahmadinejad has invested in his nuclear program could have provided so much cheap power if it were used to turn its vast oil supplies into domestic electricity and gas. The Iranian president is as comfortable with the Big Lie as any Democrat and he repeated it once again: his nation has no interest in building nuclear weapons. The sanctions that the UN has imposed as a result of his nuclear ambitions clearly chafed however, no matter how ineffective those measures have been. Ahmadinejad chided the UN for maintaining its five nation security council and mused about how much more effective the body would be if only Iran had veto power too.

Though he tried very hard to appear statesmanlike, Ahmadinejad couldn’t help but lapse into being Ahmadinejad, which is to say that the crazy bubbled over at times. Talking about the 9-11 attacks for example, he declared that there was little evidence that Islamic terrorists were involved. Instead, he revealed his version of the true nature of the attacks:
[S]ome segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order to save the Zionist regime. The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view.
The supposition that the American economy was in decline in 2001, or that toppling the Twin Towers, attacking the Pentagon and crashing an airliner into a field in Pennsylvania was the formula to fix our supposed fiscal ills is certainly a unique view of history. How those attacks strengthened our position among our tenuous allies in the Arab world, or how 9/11 “saved” Israel are two equally mysterious concepts. The events of September 11, 2001 emboldened Islamic fanatics rather than cow them. And the only people who benefited economically from the attacks were those Muslims “in the know” who sold short on United and American stocks. The rest of us dealt with a recession.

The “plight” of the Palestinian people is never far from the Iranian president’s aggrieved heart, and he once again cried crocodile tears over their fate before the UN. Ahmadinejad doesn’t care about Palestinian refugees any more than he cares about the tens of millions of his countrymen wallowing in poverty in Iran while the mullahs live like royalty. Palestinian refugees are however useful pawns that can be played as he pursues his ultimate goal of destroying Israel. He said that Palestinians are being “deprived of food, water and medicine in their own homeland,” although he did not complain that Hamas or Hezbollah lacks for AK-47s, mortars or RPGs. Ahmadinejad rather stuck to the script, even if he didn’t call for the outright destruction of Israel this time. Instead, he said that Palestinians should be awarded jurisdiction over their “homeland,” which sounds a little nicer than “nuke Israel,” even if it achieves the same result.

Ahmadinejad’s true feelings and motivations were revealed on the cover page which accompanied the official transcript of his remarks. This quote appears on it: “Oh, God; hasten the arrival of Imam Al-Mahdi and grant him good health and victory and make us his followers and those who attest to his rightfulness.” Shia’ Muslims believe that Al-Mahdi is the legendary “twelfth Imam” who has been in hiding for over a millennium, but who will reappear to lead the righteous to victory over evil when the world is in chaos. Appealing to Al-Mahdi is therefore to wish for chaos – a world in flames which only the ultimate holy-warrior can rescue. Ahmadinejad is a fanatic who longs for that kind of righteous victory, but his contradictory, disturbing and delusional remarks before the UN have revealed once again that he yearns for the chaos that must proceed Islam’s ultimate triumph.


**Write to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at http://www.president.ir/en/ **

President Barack Obama's Schedule: Friday, September 24 2010

President Barack Obama's Schedule: Friday, September 24 2010


All Times ET





11:15 am
The President holds a bilateral meeting with President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan
Waldorf Astoria Hotel
Pool Spray at the Top

12:15 pm
 
 
The President holds a bilateral meeting with President Juan Manuel Santos Calderón of Colombia
Waldorf Astoria Hotel
Pool Spray at the Top
1:00 pm
 
 
The President attends working luncheon with ASEAN leaders
United Nations Building
Pool Spray at the Top
3:15 pm
 
 
The President attends Ministerial Meeting on Sudan
United Nations Building
Open Press
5:00 pm
 
 
The President holds bilateral meeting with President Roza Otunbayeva of Krygyzstan
Waldorf Astoria Hotel
Pool Spray at the Top
6:55 pm
 
The President departs New York en route Andrews Air Force Base
John F. Kennedy International Airport
Open Press
7:45 pm
 
The President arrives at Andrews Air Force Base
Andrews Air Force Base
Travel Pool Coverage
8:00 pm
 
 
 
The President arrives at the White House
South Lawn



Killuminati : Tupac exposing the illuminati

Killuminati : Tupac exposing the illuminati











Flat-screen TV Prices to Plunge for Holiday Season

Flat-screen TV Prices to Plunge for Holiday Season

by David Goldman



An historically large oversupply of LCD TV panels is causing television prices to fall right in time for the holiday shopping season.

By the end of this month, LCD TV prices will be about 5% lower than they were at the same time last year, according research firm DisplaySearch. But a tailspin will start in October: In the last three months of the year, the firm forecasts that prices will keep falling until they bottom out at 12% below 2009 levels.


32-Inch LCD TV Average Price


In some blowout sales, the price slash could be even more dramatic.

On Black Friday this year, 32-inch LCD TVs will drop to an average price of between $249 and $299, with the best deals as low as $199, according to a prediction from research firm iSuppli. The 32-inch LCD TVs currently sell for $349 to $399, on average, with the cheapest model (Emerson's LC320EMX) selling for $300.

The forecasted price plunge stems from an enormous surplus of LCD panels that has accumulated over the first nine months of the year. Shipments of the panels rose to 52 million in the second quarter, but only 38.7 million TVs were actually shipped to retailers, according to iSuppli.

That 36% inventory gap piles on top of a 25% oversupply in the first quarter. Those figures are higher than anything seen in 2009 -- which was also an awful year for flat-screen TVs. Sales were were so bad last year that prices fell by as much as 30%, according to DisplaySearch.

Why is the supply chain so overstuffed? Because demand for flat-screen TVs has been sluggish this year, thanks in part to manufacturers' decision to hold back on price chops. The average selling price for LCD TVs even increased in July, as larger TVs and those with Internet and 3-D capabilities were added to the mix.

Prices finally starting to fall in August -- after this summer's World Cup proved to be a much smaller sales catalyst than TV makers had hoped.

"Manufacturers were playing a game of chicken, hoping demand would be there and reluctant to be the first one to let prices fall," said Paul Gagnon, director of TV research at DisplaySearch. "Only recently did they come to the shocking realization that prices needed to fall. That will have a good impact on holiday sales."

Like many consumers, flat-screen TV shoppers are becoming increasingly budget-conscious -- especially as the economy shows signs of slowing down.

But there is also evidence that consumers have pent-up demand for TVs. LED TVs, which use a different backlight technology than LCD TVs, were aggressively priced in the beginning of the year and actually sold better than expected, according to Sweta Dash, senior director of LCD Research at iSuppli.

Once big discounts start hitting retailers, demand for LCD TVs will jump up aggressively, Gagnon predicted.

But consumers should act fast. The supply chain is beginning to correct itself, iSuppli found. Those kinds of recalibrations generally take about three months to be realized at the retail level. That means prices will likely bottom out at the end of this year or the beginning of 2011.